In the subsection of “The
Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism” titled “Usemonopoly”, Lethem uses the quote
“everything from attempts” to “defendant as young as twelve”. The original
source was fairly easy to find; I simply Googled the original author’s name and
the title of the article published in The
New York Times and the first result that appeared linked me to Robert
Boynton’s article on The New York Times
website. In Boynton’s article, he first prefaces the quote by describing an
incident with students at Swarthmore College leaking confidential information
online about the vulnerability of voting machines created by Diebold Election
Systems during the 2000 presidential election. Because of litigation, Diebold
threatened to sue and Swarthmore College had to pull the confidential
information from their website. Boynton then writes this quote, explaining that
copyrighting issues have plagued all fields of study and forms of
entertainment.
Lethem instead starts off the
“Usemonopoly” subsection with this quote to set the stage for his further
discussion on the corrupt system of copyright in our world today. Lethem does
make minor changes to the quote, such as removing an aside that Boynton had put
in parenthesis, and removing and introduction to the Recording Industry
Association example. They are made mostly to make the passage shorter and more
concise, as the message of the passage still transfers in Lethem’s version. In
an academic setting, this would be blatant and obvious plagiarism, as Lethem
almost copies word for word what Boynton published. If Lethem did not cite the
quote, it would also be appropriation, as even though it is not a direct
copy-paste of the passage, the majority of it, as well as the major themes of
the passage, transfer directly into Lethem’s paper and uses it as his own.
I too mentioned "usemonopoly" in my blog focusing on the corruptness behind plagiarizing. The essay centers on plagiarizing and the debate on whether plagiarism should be seen as detrimental to society or necessary. To plagiarize it could mean that you draw inspiration but not necessarily copying "word-for-word." However, usemonopoly suggests that copyright is detrimental to the individuals of a community and their originality in their work. It is needed to give credit to the original piece of work to satisfy everyone that could be affected when your "drawing inspiration." Otherwise, plagiarism is seen in a negative light in Lethem's essay. This could relate to the Duke iPod experiment from the Davidson reading in which students were given iPods to draw inspiration from each other in their studies to learn more efficiently. In a sense, this could involve the issue of plagiarism since it would make it easier for kids to see each other's works over a social network. Hence, the iPod experiment clearly possesses no restrictions against plagiarism which is a flawed element to the experiment.
ReplyDelete