A key term that is explored
throughout “The Myth of the Ant Queen” is “complexity.” When I first approached
this word, my mind immediately associated a tangled web yielding many
dimensions. My idea of the word complex was an adjective that describes
something comprised of many components put together deliberately and
delicately. However, Johnson offers a two-fold definition that is similar to
mine but sheds more light on an unexpected angle. The first part he describes
is “sensory overload,” which essentially refers to the initial overstimulation
that is elicited when approaching a “complex” structure. Similar to my original
understanding, anything described as complex will require much observation and
exploration to fully comprehend. It is built from many separate entities which can
each be broken down further. This is similar to concepts we study here at
school; Biology is complex in that the general study can be specialized into
other smaller, extremely specific subjects such as molecular biology. The complex
system of education described in Davidson’s work can be better understood by
deciphering the interconnecting levels within itself – similar to starting with
the “bottom-up” method.
The second
section of the definition Johnson provides for complexity describes the
underlying order within an apparent mess. Despite how unorganized a structure
may appear, the difference between something complex and a true messy
conglomerate is a “strange kind of order” (Johnson 199). The components are apparently
strewn together yet function seamlessly. This is similar to the streets of a
city such as New York: at first glance, it is an overwhelming stream of people.
However, upon closer examination, each person walks with a purpose and follows tacit
rules of the streets to create a weaving motion of functionality. The
definition of complexity itself is complex.
No comments:
Post a Comment