I apologize for the late post, as I
just enrolled in this class! I am looking forward to meeting you
all. That being said however, I would most likely have not taken a
writing course such as this one if it weren't for the fact that this
class is a requirement for graduation as an engineer. Even though I
would associate engineering more with STEM than with writing, I do
appreciate the need for engineers to be well versed in written
communication of ideas. I feel as though my writing skills are
already proficient enough for a college level and thus I should not
have to take this course, but this can easily be refuted in that I
might be overestimating my writing abilities based on good high
school grades.
The authors of the NHR
claim that writing is “a way of thinking new thoughts” (Miller,
Spellmeyer xviii). The goal of a writer is to take existing material
and combine them in a new and unexpected way. During the process of
research and drafting, a writer will discover connections between
topics, and in the end produce an essay documenting the discoveries
they made.
The
authors of the NHR are
promoting the theme of broad and connective education. Education is
most useful not within the confines of a single classroom or subject,
but rather “beyond the reach of what we know here and now […]
when we shift our focus from one reality to another” (Miller,
Spellmeyer xxv). Many disciplines of study are isolated from each
other and the real world; it would take a truly learned person to
establish the underlying commonalities beneath them all. The annoying
student who constantly asks “When will we ever use this in real
life?” to their math teacher has a valid point. Knowledge without
an understanding of how it connects to the surrounding world is
useless. Of course, it is impractical for a single person to be well
versed in everything on Earth, which is where a “shared horizon”
comes into play. This shared horizon is the source from which one can
pull from the experiences of others through the texts they write.
One term that the
others seem to use in an unusual way is “formal education”. The
talk about “formal education” in a disapproving tone, citing how
it tends to keep disciplines separate. This seems to suggest that
this textbook will be anything but “formal education” and we will
be reading unconventional texts and analyzing them in ways we are not
used to.
All in all, I am
excited to improve my writing and broaden my horizons in this class.
No comments:
Post a Comment