In the passage, the
words “crowdsourcing” and “expertise” are most certainly important. Crowdsourcing
is the main subject of the passage and it is heavily contrasted with expertise.
The author here tells the reader about crowdsourcing and its benefits, using
expertise as a contrast to which crowdsourcing is a better alternative. The
author argues that working together is always the better alternative, and even
experts improve and produce better results when working in a group.
This passage
gives a summary of the concept of crowdsourcing, and discusses its benefits as
opposed to expertise and the “hierarchies” taught by formal education. The
author discusses what crowdsourcing does that is different from expertise, and
why it is better. The author states, “crowdsourcing is suspicious of expertise,
because the more expert we are, the more likely we are to be limited in what we
even conceive to be the problem, let alone the answer” (Davidson 51). In this
example, the author argues that expertise limits one’s view or conception of
the problem at hand, and thus limit’s one’s ability to solve it. This implies
that crowdsourcing gives a group a broader interpretation of the problem, thus
opening up a greater number of possible solutions. While the group may not have
one single expert, their collective mind is greater and they have a better
chance of solving a problem than any single expert.
The passage
gives an important example that supports the author’s main argument of the
passage. Davidson is essentially arguing that the current education system is
outdated, and that it needs to be improved to accommodate modern society. In
this example, she shows how a new, modern form of problem solving –
crowdsourcing – is more effective than the older, formal education form of
problem solving – expertise. She then goes on following the passage with examples
of crowdsourcing in practice, convincing the reader further of her point.
No comments:
Post a Comment