Humans are constantly being influenced by
their surroundings: whether it is social factors, environmental factors, or
anything in between, all variables will have some effect on how someone behaves.
As a result, how a person thinks, acts, or reacts in a situation can vary
drastically from person to person, resulting in a wide variety of unique
personalities across society. The development of human character is a topic
that is relevant in any context, as it is a universal experience that occurs in
every individual—yet at the same time, no two individuals will ever share the
exact same character. Science has been able to prove that about half of our behavior
is influenced by genetics, leaving the other half to be determined by external
influences (Gladwell 159). However, exactly how these external influences affect
human behavior is more unclear. From a neurological standpoint, psychologists
such as Barbara Fredrickson, author of the book Love 2.0, believe that behavior is a result of boosted brain
activity that occurs when interacting with others. All human interaction
generates what Fredrickson calls “positivity resonance” between people’s minds,
allowing them to synchronize with one another and deepen their connection
(Fredrickson 109). The biological components of positivity resonance become
more sensitive with increased amounts of positive interaction, thus causing a
person more inclined to continue to act positively. From a psychological
standpoint, however, author Malcom Gladwell believes that personality relies on
the titular concept in his essay The Power
of Context, wherein the “Power of Context” states that people are more
likely to act a certain way due to their perception of the details within an
environment (Gladwell 155). A person’s character, then, is loosely defined and
can change with the context of the situation; consistency in behavior only appears
consistent because the environment is fairly controlled (Gladwell 160). While both
of these theories certainly play a role in determining a person’s behavior, an
analysis of the two reveals that positivity resonance may be more influential
in determining how a person’s overall disposition is developed, and that the Power
of Context is less relevant than Gladwell makes it out to be in terms of
defining a person’s character.
Emily,
ReplyDeleteI think this is a very well written introduction. You are very clear with what you are doing, and you express each author's ideas in way that's quite easy to understand. One issue I had with it is that it seemed to me that you were summarizing the authors' ideas a little too much, and not focusing on your own arguments. You only dedicate one sentence, however a detailed one, to your argument, and do not discuss how these sources will support your argument. I think if you discuss your argument a little more, this introduction will be perfect!