Throughout
history, problem solving and the creation of ideas have been crucial to the success
of war planning and revolutions. Without effective problem solving and ideas,
war plans and revolutions are bound to fail. Cathy Davidson, in her work “Project
Classroom Makeover,” and Johnathan Lethem, in his work “The Ecstasy of Influence:
A Plagiarism,” each provide methods of problem solving and idea development
that, when analyzing specific historical events, have had an important influence
on history. For Davidson, this method is termed “crowdsourcing” (51). Essentially,
this method states that the most effective way to solve problems is to have the
most individuals possible working together to come to a solution. Through this
method, the most possible solutions to solving the problem arise, and the group
as a whole can choose the optimal solution. On the other hand, Lethem’s method
is called “plagiarism” (213). In his method, ideas are formed by taking the
ideas or work of others, improving on them, and arising with a new idea or
solution that suits the needs of the person or problem at hand. When analyzing
the Bolsheviks’ plan for seizing power in the 1917 Russian Revolution and the
Allied plans in the invasion of Europe in World War II, these methods appear prominently,
with the revolutionaries and the Allied war planners using both methods in
determining their solutions. Such an analysis provides revisions and a partial
justification to Steven Johnson’s argument in his work “The Myth of the Ant
Queen,” and thus a revision to the common belief that single, great people are
the cause for significant historical change as opposed to groups of people.
Tom,
ReplyDeleteYou have a very strong thesis and I especially like how you are challenging a commonly held belief. To emphasize it more, however, I would recommend making it it's own sentence separate from the part about Johnson. The introduction does a good job of starting broad and gradually narrowing by introducing the specific historic events you mean to analyze. I would also recommend trying to make your summaries of Davidson and Let her more brief, because they take up a large chunk of your introduction and might be better suited for body paragraphs.