1. How does the redefinition of "personality" contribute to the scholarly discussion about the subject? What is its significance and why does this change the angle at which we can view the argument?
2. What is the importance of the two proposed methods of developing personality? What can we learn by studying them as individually separate methods, or by studying their effect when the methods are working together?
3. What are the implications of knowing how to influence the development of personality? Should we utilize this information in society, or not?
No comments:
Post a Comment