The academic
integrity policy at Rutgers defines plagiarism in a way that differs greatly
from that of Johnathan Lethem. While Rutger’s connotes the word with peril and
crime, Lethem sheds light on the term as one of admiration. As Lethem describes,
“If nostalgic cartoonists had never borrowed from Fritz
the Cat, there would be no Ren & Stimpy Show; without the
Rankin/Bass and Charlie Brown Christmas specials, there would be no South
Park; and without The Flintstones — more or less The
Honeymooners in cartoon loincloths — The Simpsons would cease to
exist. If those don’t strike you as essential losses, then consider the
remarkable series of “plagiarisms” that links Ovid’s “Pyramus and Thisbe” with
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Leonard Bernstein’s West Side
Story, or Shakespeare’s description of Cleopatra, copied nearly verbatim
from Plutarch’s life of Mark Antony and also later nicked by T. S. Eliot for The
Waste Land. If these are examples of plagiarism, then we want more
plagiarism” (214). Essentially the
plagiarism he speaks of is driven by inspiration rather than direct, exact
usage of some information. He acknowledges that plagiarism in this form is
inevitable as everything in the ether is technically a form of inspiration for
everything else. However, this type of “plagiarism” is not to be punished;
rather, it is to be encouraged. This piggybacking of ideas is what makes the
world of art thrive as brightly as it does. Each artist contributes to the
existing collective of creativity and ideas, allowing the next artists to tap
into this in their own pieces. The type of plagiarism mentioned in Rutger’s
academic policy is more concerned about citations for direct quotes or
paraphrasing in essays. Although both cases technically involve “the use of
another person’s words, ideas, or results,” Lethem’s includes a use that uses
only the basis of the idea and transforms the details of it. When it comes to
essays, citations are clearly needed to prove the derivation of all supporting
information – without them this is in fact plagiarism. But the “plagiarism”
Lethem describes, the one founded upon inspiration and molding of new ideas
upon older ones, is perfectly acceptable and necessary in order to have
progression. Overall, no idea is truly original, but the extent of directness
or how verbatim it is to another determines the type of plagiarism it falls
under.
No comments:
Post a Comment